Recent research out of Germany suggests that employees who are forced to smile and take insults from customers at work are more likely to suffer from stress and poor health. That seems like common sense to me. People who are "forced" to do anything typically experience stress, and certainly it's stressful to be insulted by anyone - customer or otherwise.
What surprised me was the proposed solution:
"[The Researcher] found that those able to answer back had a brief increase in heart rate. Those who could not had stress symptoms that lasted much longer....[and] suggested that people who must keep smiling on the job should get regular breaks to let it out."
I'd like to know what the researchers mean by "answering back." According to dictionary.com (see #23) it means:
"answer back, to reply impertinently or rudely."
Maybe I am a dinosaur, but I am from the school of "the customer is always right." When I first entered the workforce some 20 years ago I was taught that while there are plenty of times that the customer is not necessarily "right" in a literal sense, any customer who was prepared to spend money on a product or service offered by my employer deserved to be treated with respect which included listening to him, and working to create a mutually satisfying solution. I would never have dreamed of "answering back." Besides the potential for harming my career, I wouldn't have been proud of myself for sinking to the level of an insulting customer.
Fortunately for me, I had bosses and co-workers who taught me to take pride in being creative in finding ways for both the customer and my company to "win." It became something of a game and was actually rather fun to have a challenging situation come up where I could transform an unhappy customer into a happy one. Often it forged stronger customer relationships in the process. Along the way, I developed communication and business skills that have served me well over the course of my career.
Obviously, the research situation was not real. No matter how bad some workplaces can be, I suspect there are very few where workers are routinely subjected to insults and "forced" to smile. So if you are in a situation where you sometimes are faced with difficult customers, go ahead and smile. Treat it as a chance to use your creativity and innovation to solve a business problem and take pride in producing great results. I guarantee you the high you get from that type of success will far exceed any temporally relief you feel from "answering back."
The customer is always right, but no one ever should have to take abuse either. Nor should anyone ever be asked to behave like a doormat. In the end, clients won't be impressed by this approach, either.
I have found very clever assistance in such books as _The Gentle Art of Self Defense_. The essence of most of these strategies consists mainly of ways to deflect abuse back at the abuser rather than aggravate or add to it. It even helps to practice.
Posted by: almostgotit | June 18, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I must say that the title of the research article was chosen to get attention and invite differing viewpoints. I don't believe that smiling in and of itself is detrimental to one's health. Being forced to negate your own feelings and act as if you feel another way IS. In this report the researcher admitted "Every time a person is forced to repress his true feelings there are negative consequences."
This study also took place in a call center, the type of job that at least in the U.S. typically has a very high turnover rate. No doubt! Being forced to take insult and abuse should not be part of a person's job, even in a call center.
You offer great insight regarding this article. We don't need to repress our feelings when challenged. Instead we can kick into creative-solution-finding mode. I don't necessarily think that the customer is always "right", but I definitely believe that trying to make customers happy and pleased with one's products/services is of the utmost importance. Most companies are market-driven, meaning customers are in the drivers seats.
Posted by: MMG | June 19, 2008 at 08:30 AM
from my customer support days I remember being taught that when faced with a difficult customer it is best to put both feet on the floor. Somehow that helps you feel confident while *taking it* and makes you less inclined to "talk back". I would venture to guess though that the mute button is the savior for most in the call center which provides a win/win for all involved, unless, of course, you get confused as to when you are on mute ;-)
Posted by: Meg Bear | June 19, 2008 at 01:53 PM
I had reason to call my cell phone provider this morning as my handset developed a mysterious fault overnight. The young man who answered gave me the impression that he was quite new to this. He told me I had not registered the handset so they could not replace it. I have been a customer of this company for many years and expected better but I just asked what I could do to resolve the problem. To his credit he went off to find out - and came back to tell me how to circumvent the company "rules" so that we were both happy. Early morning call, unhappy and confused customer at the other end, bad message to deliver - you would think it was a recipe for disaster but a crisis in our relationship it has ( so far)been averted.
My point? Sometimes companies have rules that for reasons best known to them need to be enforced (see there's the root of that word force again)and some poor employee has to do it. How they respond is key to how they should be valued as employees.
Posted by: Jackie Cameron | June 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM